LA NUOVA DEMOCRAZIA Illusioni di civiltà nell'era dell'egemonia Usa 
ANTONELLA RANDAZZO
THE NEW DEMOCRACY. Illusions of U.S. hegemony in the era civilization
(Zambon Publisher)
With the defeat of Nazi thought we got rid from the most dangerous criminals. But today, in light of new documents and new witnesses, we can argue that it is not. The crimes were only moved from Europe to Third World areas, under the pretext of "bringing freedom" to the people. In the name of freedom and democracy have been committed countless crimes and genocide.
The title "New Democracy", takes over the definition that the dictator Augusto Pinochet gave to the new situation Chile has arisen following the massacre of thousands of people and the suppression of the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende. The New Democracy is a "democracy without people." The "new democracies" are now many, implemented and yet, tragically, to be implemented. The world today is far from being liberated by those who arrogate to themselves the power to commit crimes in the name of an ideology that is in the profit and power in his only God
This disconcerting fact there is rendered incomprehensible by the media , showing horrifying images of children dying from hunger and do not tell us anything about what is owed. Prevent the emergence of the paradox of a West that is professed and scientifically advanced advanced, but is not able to save many human beings from starvation. Bodies of migrants are shown floating lifeless in the Straits of Gibraltar, but we do not explain the political and economic reasons which force them to flee their country, risking their lives. The media show us and guerrilla wars but do not tell us who manufactures and sells the weapons that make this possible.
It 's time to put all the pieces of the puzzle in place, to make possible the full understanding of reality. And to tell who are the perpetrators.
This book sheds light on the causes of the major problems that oppress humanity. Without hesitation indicates the cause and its perpetrators.
Despite the book face merciless light on the horrors of which some human beings are capable, the conclusions are not pessimistic. Instead, the idea is to find the crimes is the first step for us not to go unpunished and to create a better world. The book not only identifies the crimes of the imperial giant, but his feet of clay.
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................... ............... 5
CHAPTER I - WHEN THE ENEMY WAS COMMUNIST
........ 21 CHAPTER II - THE CIA AND ITS CRIMES .....
................... 79 CHAPTER III - RELIGION AND EMPIRE ...................... ..... 119
CHAPTER IV - FICTION AND REALITY '
........................... 145 CHAPTER V - USEFUL extremist and fundamentalist
.. 215 CHAPTER VI - REBELS EMPIRE
........................... 267 CHAPTER VII - FRIENDS AND ENEMIES OF TODAY ......... ............ 367
FIGURES .................................. ............................... 470
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............... .......................................... 473
INTRODUCTION
We all wondered at least once in the world because many people are forced to live in conditions of extreme suffering from hunger, war, misery and exploitation affect billions of people. Understanding and finding answers is possible, but implica necessariamente il prendere atto che dietro queste sofferenze ci sono dei precisi responsabili. Persone che hanno il potere di imporre al mondo intero un sistema iniquo, in cui il privilegio e l'avidità di pochi corrispondono alla sofferenza e alla condanna di molti.
Nel 1948, George Kennan, un funzionario del Dipartimento di Stato Usa, confessava:
"Possediamo il 50 per cento della ricchezza mondiale, ma solo il 6,3 per cento della sua popolazione. In questa situazione, il nostro vero lavoro nel periodo a venire è di escogitare uno schema di relazioni che ci permetta di mantenere questa posizione di disparità. Per farlo, dobbiamo abbandonare ogni sentimentalismo... dovremmo smetterla di pensare ai diritti umani, all'innalzamento del tenore di vita e alla democratizzazione" (1).
Questa verità viene tenuta nascosta, mentre vengono propagandate presunte motivazioni "etiche" e "umanitarie" della politica americana. Nella propaganda mediatica non contano i fatti ma le percezioni. Come sostiene George Bush junior, la verità non è ma "si costruisce", e "le percezioni contano più dei fatti"(2) . I media spostano l'attenzione per nascondere fatti e responsabilità. Chi indica i fatti diventa "'antiamericano", oppure "antioccidentale" o "antipatriottico". Allontanare i fatti e i responsabili dalla realtà mediatica fa parte del progetto di nascondere la verità sul mondo.
Alla fine della Seconda guerra mondiale il mondo usciva from the nightmare of war, with great confidence to rebuild what was destroyed and, above all, with the certainty of having eliminated the "monster" Nazi. He sings the praises of a better world, because the "bad guys" were defeated. In this context, the U.S. appeared to be victorious heroes who had liberated the people from the tyrant.
Nazism, the Holocaust and Hitler were narrated as the "absolute evil", or as due to a mysterious dark force that had taken possession of a democratically elected government, prompting him to make unheard-of crimes. Calling Hitler "monster", and the Holocaust "absolute evil" (3), the events Nazis were placed outside of history itself, alienated from others facts that belong to historical time. This makes it even more unacceptable Nazism, understood as being due to a perversion denied by the same Western history. So he prevented the wider awareness of reality and existing, closely linked to Nazism. He hid it so heinous crimes had been committed by Europeans in the colonial lands. Native Americans were already long goal of extermination, in African and Asian colonies, Europeans had committed several acts of genocide, which did not appear as such only because the natives did not enjoy the same rights as settlers, being considered inferior.
The idea of \u200b\u200bhaving to purify the "race" and having to kill a group persons considered worthless or dangerous, already belonged to Western culture. For example, in May 1898, British Prime Minister Robert Arthur Salisbury, very attentive to British colonial policy (4), in a speech at the Albert Hall cynically acknowledged that "we can roughly divide the nations of the world into those who live and those who are dying. " The model that Hitler had followed, as he himself admitted, was the extermination of native Americans. Many of those who massacred the Indians were given medals by American presidents. General Philip Henry Sheridan (1831-1888) stated that "the only good Indian I know of is the dead Indian." Almost all the presidents Americans acted in perfect accord with him. In the Thirties, some American scientists found an effective way to permanently eliminate the "inferior races" (5) through eugenic techniques, which were legalized and implemented in many states. Hitler have deep admiration for American scholars, who in those years published several papers on "defense of the white race from contamination of the inferior races."
What Hitler was not forgiven, according to the writer Aimé Césaire, was "the fact that it has applied in Europe, the colonial practices that had previously been applied only to the Arabs of Algeria, the coolies of India and the Negroes' Africa "(6). Hitler had been divorced from Story because, by making the same Europe to colonize the land, had deprived the historical facts of the legitimate "moral" that the West used to subdue and enslave other peoples. In other words, the rules and laws that apply in the Western world should continue to be different from those applied in the colonial lands. The colonial cruelty should not be treated equally the same cruelties committed in Europe: the colonial cruelty were "legitimate" while orders in Europe were "absolute evil beyond history." Hitler was, therefore, be demonized and seen very differently from other powerful Western. His ferocity was "monstrous" because it is directed against the Europeans. He was a monster, born from the "evil" itself, not by history.
This also served to hide the fact that Hitler could never do anything of what he did without any support from those countries that now demonized. As stated Peter Calvocoressi, Prosecutor at Nuremberg: "The industrialists were the engine of the German state. The real backbone of Germany's armed forces were not, or at least not only them, but the industrial and financial power. Without it there would be was no army. "
The Second World War was explained in the dynamic dictatorship / democracy. The end of fascism and Nazism was celebrated as the return to the ideals of freedom, democrazia e giustizia. A tutt'oggi molti pensano alla Seconda guerra mondiale come ad un conflitto fra "valori" diversi, come se gli Alleati fossero stati completamente estranei all'ascesa di Hitler e al rafforzamento delle sue mire espansionistiche. Alcuni studi storici (7) ci fanno capire che non è così. Le imprese e le banche occidentali, soprattutto quelle americane, avevano ricavato dalla guerra profitti enormi. Avevano giocato bene le loro carte finanziando l'ascesa di Hitler e la sua preparazione alla guerra. Non era la prima volta, né sarebbe stata l'ultima, che il potere economico e finanziario americano utilizzava un dittatore mostruoso per realizzare i suoi progetti. Alcune grosse imprese Usa (come la Ibm, la Ford Motor Company, la General Motors e la Standard Oil) avevano continuato a produrre per il führer anche durante la guerra, dimostrando palesemente che per loro gli alti profitti contavano più della vita umana. Durante la guerra avevano utilizzato ampiamente lavoratori coatti, che trattavano alla stessa stregua di oggetti senza valore. Un lavoratore anonimo scrisse in una lettera: "L'Ibm è un mostro internazionale... come i nazisti" (8).
La Ford, anche dopo l'entrata in guerra degli Usa, continuò a produrre materiale bellico, che sarebbe stato utilizzato contro gli americani. Le fabbriche americane in Germania non vennero mai bombardate durante la guerra. Le banche e le imprese americane si erano dichiarate "neutrali", e avevano tratto parecchi vantaggi the bloody war that would weaken the European empires and strengthened the American empire. Today, those same companies and banks are stronger than ever, and fomenting wars in different parts of the world, for the same reasons: to strengthen its dominance and for large profits.
E 'question whether imperialism was indeed defeated, as we were led to believe, or whether it was deleted from German imperialism of Hitler. If
imperialism we mean a political-military-economic system of a particular nation that stands as superior to all others and makes terrible crimes with impunity, then the historical facts tell us that it never died, and has continued to commit genocide, and led terrible wars. The difference is that after the Second World War, crime and genocide have been reported outside of Europe, in those lands considered to plunder and exploit. Lands where human life has the same value that is given in rich countries.
After Hitler, it became clear that imperialism produced terrible crimes, and the term was banned (9). In the infamous words of "imperialism" was replaced, quite wrongly, the word "democracy" (10), and for many years the imperialist crimes were disguised as "struggles for freedom of peoples," and "democracy."
Since the end of the Second World War, the U.S. power strove to increase its energy resources and prevent wherever the birth of an alternative model to the capitalist West. The wake of war, violence and cruelty is very long. The dichotomy dictatorship / democracy was revived through the "red danger", with which the United States to exert influence in many parts of the world war. The military operations carried out by the U.S. to impose its hegemony have been at least 60 since the last World War to today. Under the pretext of "defending the people from tyrants," the U.S. has devastated many countries, who were "guilty" of wanting to implement an alternative political-economic system in the U.S..
the Second World War was created ad hoc a reality in which it seemed that the crimes and abuses of power belonged to the past. U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Atlantic Charter (1941), spoke for the first time for redemption of colonized peoples, freedom and self-determination. But they were just fine words, which obscured the intent to supplant its dominance to European.
Additional historical developments reveal a face of the West, particularly the U.S., quite different from what the media propaganda show. The wars of yesterday against the enemy "communist", or those of today against the enemy "terrorists", have hidden and continue to hide the paradoxes of the Western world to U.S. hegemony. A world that professes to have democratic institutions, an analysis depth, does not respect at all.
The paradoxes and contradictions in the West today, to U.S. hegemony, are many. We think the constitutional principle of equality of citizens, defended by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This principle (as the values \u200b\u200bof "Justice," "Tranquility" and "general welfare"), supported in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution is not respected in reality. There are certain characteristics of the American economic system that effectively exclude the possibility that constitutional values \u200b\u200bare protected. In the U.S. economic power is in the hands of a very limited group of people. The power to print money is in the hands of a private group banks, defined Federal Reserve, a designation that causes most to think that this is an institution of government. U.S. citizens are charged a fee for this absurd private monopoly, which absorbs much of their wealth.
A small group of people, who are often the same companies that own, decide the fate of many countries, through the denial or the giving of money. For an oligarchic economic system can only be matched by a political system with the same characteristics. American presidents are all belonging to the rich class, and their campaigns received, both candidates, financing by the firms and banks themselves. The American political system is based on the personality of the candidates as if it were a spectacle, and media create political figures the same way as Hollywood stars. Democracy has been reduced to a "ritual", held to give the illusion people to count for something. Michel Chossudovsky observes: "No alternative is offered to the electorate. Neoliberalism is an integral part of the political platform of all major political parties. As in the one-party state, the election results have virtually no impact on the effective management of policy economic and social status "(11).
After the end of the Cold War, the economic-financial elite acquired American security and wealth to dominate the whole world. The fame that he had freed from dictatorship and to bring "freedom and democracy" everywhere, allowing them to propagate the culture of American culture as a "morally superior", to be broadcast around the world. But today we are living in a world where the propaganda opposed dictatorship / democracy is costing too many people. The rich American elite, especially in the last two decades, is implementing plans for world domination, and it is not a domain that could help humanity. The plan of domination and destruction is hidden by defensive and humanitarian reasons. The U.S. say they have enemies "terrorists", but then cynically kill defenseless people, say they do "humanitarian missions" but then condemn millions of people to die of hunger because of their economic policies, taxes through cleverly apparently international institutions (IMF, WB, WTO). The elite U.S. does not want a world in which wealth can be redistributed more, and does not like that people can have a voice in political and economic issues. He then found the formula to establish an apparent "democracy", which covers and hides the true power.
The very word "democracy" used to the abuse of American presidents, was stripped of content that should necessarily be associated with: popular sovereignty in all matters affecting the people themselves, respect for human rights human, first and foremost the right to self determination.
writes Peter Gowan, "A New Democracy is managed by landlords capitalists who finance the political process and offer voters a choice between leaders who share the same opinions but have a different style of control ... At the same time makes the New Democracy easier for corporations to increase their influence and the media 'global' (ie Western) guiding public opinion. (This) will of the leaders in the country chosen to 'want what we want'. So there will be no need to use the stick "(12).
For "New Democracy" means "democracy" exported from the United States. The myth New Democracy was expressed by the dictator Augusto Pinochet, who, after the massacre of thousands of people and the suppression of the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende, in these words described the new situation in Chile. The New Democracy is a "democracy without people." The "new democracies" are many, implemented and yet, tragically, to be implemented. The book covers all the significant moments of American dominance of the last war to date. It identifies the paradoxes, techniques to enforce the power and to strengthen it, and the media propaganda which reverses meanings and change the facts. In the background is the terrible suffering of the people, forced to endure poverty, war, torture and massacres.
L'opera spiega anche l'ennesima menzogna di indicare nella "globalizzazione" la via per il benessere mondiale. Lunghe divagazioni nelle Università o nei Convegni in materia economica non sono ancora giunte ad una definizione univoca del termine "globalizzazione". E' impossibile definirlo senza scoprire le magagne dietro le quali si nasconde l'Occidente che si professa civile e democratico, senza considerare l'avidità dei paesi ricchi verso quelli poveri, e senza spiegare come i primi abbiano attuato stratagemmi "legali" per imporre un nuovo tipo di colonizzazione, nascosto dalle false politiche di "aiuto e sviluppo".
Secondo l'economista Boris Kagarlitsky, "globalizzazione non significa impotenza dello Stato, ma rigetto da parte dello State of its social function in favor of the repressive, then the end of democratic freedoms "(13).
The sociologist Ulrich Beck, referring to the word" globalization, "says:" More than a word it is a fog, a word-spectrum ... I call neo-liberal globalism dictatorship in the world market, in particular in the developing world, remains the foundation - however poor - democratic to self .... I mean by globalization, not only economic globalization but also the political, social and cultural "(14). The globalization, sooner or later require repression and war. Michel Chossudovsky asserts:" War and globalization are not separate issues ... At the dawn of the third millennium, the war and the "free market" go hand in hand "(15).
Globalization is the imposition of the full power of the oligarchy to the world. Through the processes of globalization, the elite of the banks and corporations has failed to enforce its rules to bend if governments. The world was a bleak and miserable place for most of the population. The political elite have produced unemployment, forced millions of people to work with very low wages, have eliminated the social welfare policies of the weakest, and they removed the real power from the hands of the representatives of the people. By putting profit above all things, have stirred new wars and new genocide. The U.S. today place themselves above any law, and consider the Bill of Rights of 1948 a "letter to Santa Claus," as Reagan's ambassador, Jeane Kirkpatrick, referring in particular Article 25, speaking of economic man.
Banks companies are enriched with economic crises and wars. The crisis created by the banks, cutting off credit and demanded payment. Wars are an excellent source of profits for banks and businesses, as they help to increase the debt of the country and exporting large quantities of weapons.
The world today is dominated by U.S. power of the oligarchy, a greedy and power based on lies. As Gore Vidal observes bluntly: "Their hearts are clearly elsewhere, making money, far from our mock Roman temples, where, alas, we are left with only their heads, who dream of war, preferably against weak peripheral countries" (16) .
Today many scholars argue that the condition of the U.S. should worry the world. For example, the American scholar writes Carolyn Baker:
"If we confront the tortured truths of American history that are related to 9 / 11 or the genocide of Native Americans made by European Americans in the 17th century, or any the atrocities perpetrated by the U.S. government of which I have said, we are forced to confront our false belief, deeply indelible amerocentrica clearly that America the beautiful is also the 'America as pure as snow ", or the' down America over the conduct of the nations 'children'."
Everything in our culture and our upbringing instilled in us a sense of arrogance and specialty filled automoralità in relation to the rest of the world. The "other" nations are corrupt, we look with satisfaction, pointing to some Latin American dictators, morally degraded. The "other" nations kill and torture their citizens without regard for the value of human life - but not in America. We use the phrase "conspiracy theory", almost as a synonym "schizophrenia" to describe (and slander) theories we hear too unbearable to believe it. Maybe some other government in some distant land, led by tyrants with strange sounding names in drug trafficking and laundering the profits through their exchanges. In some other nation, there is no rule of law, and the government allows its citizens to be massacred in a while to make and continue a war for political and monetary gains or for re-accumulation of natural resources in rapid decline "(17).
The neoliberal policies imposed by the late '70s, has now reached unbelievable levels of devastation in many countries. The IMF, the World Bank and the WTO are offered as organizations that fight for "developing countries". But poor countries are not "developing" because their development can be stifled at birth by the rich countries, through these organizations. Of the 143 WTO member countries, only the rich can put twenty-one courses of action. And the IMF decided uniquely by the economic policies imposed on poor countries. The historian Mark Curtis, based in Doha at the WTO summit in 2001, said:
"(The) Economic growth (is) an emerging pattern of threats and intimidation of poor countries. It 'was really outrageous, rich countries use their power to support the interests of big business blatantly. L'argomento delle corporazioni multinazionali quali causa di povertà non era proprio all'ordine del giorno; era come una conferenza sulla malaria in cui non si discute neanche della zanzara" (18).
Il "The Guardian", del 6 novembre 2001, raccontò di un delegato africano intimorito e soggiogato dal potere dei paesi ricchi: "Se esprimo giudizi troppo severi il mio ministro riceverà una telefonata dagli Stati Uniti. Gli diranno che sto creando problemi agli Stati Uniti. Il mio governo non chiederà nemmeno 'cosa ho detto?'. Il giorno dopo si limiteranno a mandarmi un biglietto... così non parlo, per paura di far arrabbiare il padrone".
Barry Coates, del World Development Movement, disse: "Le nazioni ricche are still negotiating in the first place in the interests of their major corporations. And they're still hitting poor nations out of the negotiation process. Market observers say more cynical that this is the way in which trade negotiations have always been carried out. "(19)
While inequality between rich and poor is growing as never before, celebrates the power of the world capitalist economic progress in China, India or Brazil. By measuring the GDP of each country is given an estimate of the average wages of workers, the percentage of people below the poverty line, or the level of unemployment is being touted as a world different from what it really is, and we celebrate the "progress" even where the people are impoverished or working in weatshops condition.
The struggles of social movements, allegations of humanitarian organizations, and the protests of indigenous peoples, the U.S. seems to only small annoyances. The CIA calls "blowback," or "collateral damage" effects of U.S. policies is not expected. Today this "blowback" is devastating affect everyone, and can not be ignored.
The world of work, the welfare of ordinary people, the future of children, the protection of different cultures, the protection of the rights of the weakest, and so on. were swapped for other "values". William Blum notes:
"The machinery of American foreign policy is been fueled not by a devotion to any kind of morality, but rather by the need to serve other imperatives, which can be summarized below:
1) make the world safe for American corporations;
2) beautify the financial statements of employers defense at home who have contributed generously towards members of Congress;
3) prevent the emergence of any company that can act as a successful example of a model alternative to the capitalist
4) extend the political and economic hegemony over an area as wide as possible, as befits a "great power".
All this in the name of fighting a supposed moral crusade against what che freddi guerrieri si sono convinti essere, e hanno convinto il popolo americano, l'esistenza di una malvagia Cospirazione Comunista Internazionale, che in realtà non è mai esistita, malvagia o no" (20).
Oggi il mondo è nelle mani di circa 200 principali imprese Multinazionali e Transnazionali, che detengono la quasi totalità della ricchezza. Per queste imprese conta soltanto il profitto, e tutto è merce: il cibo, la salute, la cultura, l'acqua, l'educazione e persino la vita. Mentre la popolazione mondiale si impoverisce e milioni di persone vivono in gravi situazioni dovute alla disoccupazione, allo scarso reddito, o alla fame, le Corporation festeggiano successi economici mai visti prima. Le fusioni, le concentrazioni e le ristrutturazioni permettono loro di aumentare i profitti. Le imprese e le banche hanno un potere assoluto, e decidono le loro politiche economiche nel totale cinismo, e all'oscuro dei lavoratori. Oggi si possono compiere genocidi senza costruire campi di sterminio, basta privare milioni di persone del necessario per la sopravvivenza, oppure impedire l'accesso ai farmaci. Come spiega Susan George: "La scandalosa proibizione della fabbricazione e della distribuzione dei farmaci generici (contro l'Aids, la malaria, la tubercolosi ecc.) con il pretesto che si tratti di sostanze brevettate dalle transnazionali farmaceutiche non è altro che un contributo al genocidio e conferma agli occhi del mondo la dottrina che pone il commercio, la proprietà e il profitto al di sopra di ogni cosa, compresa la vita umana" (21).
Il modello neoliberale, ormai imposto come l'unico possibile, ha devastato il mondo intero. Oggi la povertà colpisce quasi l'80% degli abitanti del pianeta, e getta il mondo intero in balìa di un'insicurezza che riguarda ogni paese, e che non ha precedenti.
I movimenti sociali denunciano crimini e ingiustizie in molti paesi del mondo. Spesso chi denuncia i crimini e lotta contro la globalizzazione viene etichettato come "terrorista" o "antiamericano", e accusato di perseguire una sorta di "teoria del complotto" contro il potere libero e democratico degli Usa. In questo modo si offuscano pericolosamente gli intenti di difesa dei diritti umani, e si cerca to criminalize those who report the crime and those who do not. The powerful media propaganda is very effective, and we find ourselves, unwittingly, to label those who escapes from its contents. The U.S. hopes
power in a world where the poor being exploited to passively accept, without struggle and without reacting. Dreams of a world in which the masses remain passive towards the crimes and injustices, supported by religious faith, which gives a hope beyond this world, the only given them. Over the past twenty years the poorer classes have suffered severe cuts in U.S. assistance funds, and their conditions have seriously deteriorated. However, the Corporate Welfare (22), which includes subsidies and tax cuts for businesses, has been strengthened. Companies and banks have become much richer while ordinary citizens continue to be impoverished.
When the Western media is the issue of poverty, usually deal with special cases, without making specific references to the real causes of the problem and its leaders. The poor countries appear on television as victims of their own misfortune, natural disasters, or poverty is attributed to the existence of long internal conflict. Do not you ever explain the true motives of war, or who finances. The media shall ensure that no one asks why, if poor countries were looted from the West, now have no debts and credits. We are not accustomed to thinking that there are specific responsibilities behind the poverty, wars and hunger in the world.
This book deals with poverty and war crimes by making specific references, and without liability or hide brutal cruelty, which are still committed, sometimes from the same countries that complain.
The U.S. has become the policeman of the world, with a license to kill and torture anyone in the name of the alleged motives "ethics".
The concept of "democratic interventionism" or "ethical imperialism", which tends to legitimize the war, was developed in the '30s by Max von Baden, the future chancellor of the Reich. Von Baden said: "If he wants to resist the storms of democracy and its demand for an improvement the world, German imperialism should adopt an ethical foundation. Now we can safely write on our banners: The law is with us "(23). He was convinced that the war could improve the ethical world. His conviction was upheld by the safety culture and the German people were definitely higher any other culture and nation.
Today American presidents argue that the American people than any other, and that American culture has a mission in the world, a mission "ethics", which must be completed with any half.
The main motivation of the war on "global terrorism" stems from the belief expressed by Councillor Madeleine Albright, Thomas Friedman, "Washington knows that, without its military hegemony, America can not force the world to finance its deficit savings, which is essential for the artificial maintenance of their economic position" (24).
The way to maintain U.S. hegemony is thus the use of force, a force supported the idea that it is always right. The Americans have always been crimes committed with impunity, and continue to disfigure the world.
NOTE 1) Cited. in John Pilger, "Hidden Agenda", Fandango book, Rome 2003, p. 54.
2) Maurizio Molinari, "In Fallujah, the Pentagon's media victory. The impact of planned battle of public opinion "," La Stampa ", June 6, 2005.
3) The term was used by Winston Churchill, so that Hitler called in some documents of the period of the Second World War, which today are at the National Archives in Kew .
4) He was prime minister in 1885, during the period 1886-1892, and during the period 1895-1902). Salisbury made it possible for the annexation of Burma in 1885, and the conquest of the Transvaal and the Orange in 1899-1901.
5) Hitler claimed to have drawn lessons from the book of The Henry Ford jew International, a worldwide problem, published in Germany in 1921, in which Ford claimed that the Jews were very dangerous.
6) Aimé Césaire, "Discourse on Colonialism " Lilith, Roma 1999, p. 12.
7) Sutton Antony C., "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Press", Seal Beach (California) 1976, e "Wall Street and Franklin Delano Roosvelt", Arlington House, New York 1975. Vedi anche Sanguinetti Oscar, "Le fonti finanziarie del comunismo e del nazionalsocialismo", Cristianità, anno I, 1985 pp. 39-52.
8) Minoli Giovanni, "La Storia siamo noi", Rai3, 1 febbraio 2006.
9) Furedi Frank, nel suo libro "The New Ideology of Imperialism", Pluto, Londra, 2004, osserva che "Le pretese morali dell'imperialismo non venivano quasi mai messe in discussione in occidente. L'imperialismo, espansione globale dei poteri occidentali, veniva dipinto in termini schiettamente positivi". Ma quando si capì che il nazismo non era altro che imperialismo, il termine acquisì caratteristiche funeste e non venne più utilizzato. Oggi i processi di globalizzazione possono essere definiti come "espansione globale dei poteri occidentali", ma vengono sempre denominati in modo da apparire come favorevoli a tutti i popoli, mentre di fatto avvantaggiano soltanto il potere occidentale, e sono sicuramente imperialistici.
10) Spesso lo stesso Hitler nei suoi discorsi utilizzava alla stessa stregua di "nazismo" la parola "democrazia".
11) Chossudovsky Michel, "Globalizzazione della povertà e nuovo ordine mondiale", Ega Editore, Torino 2003, p. 347.
12) Cit. Pilger John, "Agende nascoste", op. cit., p. 64.
13) Cit. Pilger John, "I nuovi padroni del mondo", Fandango Libri, Roma 2002, p. 12.
14) Beck Ulrich, "Libertà o capitalismo", Carocci, Roma 2001.
15) Chossudovsky Michel, "Globalizzazione della povertà e nuovo ordine mondiale", Ega Editore, Torino 2003, p. 26.
16) Vidal Gore, "Le menzogne dell'impero", Fazi editore, Roma 2002.
17) Baker Carolyn, "Non è mai accaduto", http://www.psicopolis.com/PSIPOL/segnalaz.htm
18) Cit. Pilger John, "I nuovi padroni del mondo", op. cit., p. 116-117.
19) Da SchNews, n. 332, del 23 novembre 2001.
20) Blum William, "Una breve storia degli interventi degli Stati Uniti, dal 1945 al presente", http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/dekkers.htm
21) George Susan, "Fermiamo il WTO", Feltrinelli, Milano 2002, p. 78.
22) Il sistema del Corporate Welfare permette ad imprese private di poter gratuitamente sfruttare le risorse naturali del paese. A questo proposito vedi Stigliz Joseph E., "I ruggenti anni Novanta. Lo scandalo della finanza e il futuro dell'economia", Einaudi, Torino 2003.
23) "Il manifesto", 28 luglio 1998.
24) Cit. Samir Amin, "La Strategia del pugno invisibile", "Il manifesto", 29 aprile 1999.
Vedi anche "Times", 28 marzo 1999.
ALCUNI ARGOMENTI TRATTATI NEL LIBRO:
- Assetto geostrategico after the Second World War.
- What is really "terrorism."
- economic, financial and political hegemony of the West to the U.S..
- Characteristics, purpose and objectives of the mass media.
- Meaning of religious fundamentalism.
- Methods of psychological warfare.
- Significance of the Cold War.
- Causes of poverty in the Third World.
- Objectives and ideology of the U.S. authorities.
- Crimes of the Western intelligence agencies.
- Who is really bin Laden and his ties to al Qaeda.
- True meaning of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001.
- The book is accompanied by statistical tables and images.
Antonella Randazzo graduated in Philosophy at the University of Pavia, the city where he taught. It takes some time for Modern and Contemporary History, Science of Education and Human Rights. He won the
Ibiskos with the essay "If the future is black. Africa that nobody says," which analyzes the most significant characteristics of colonialism and neocolonialism, in an attempt to get a better understanding of the problems of Africa today. In 2006 he wrote the book "Rome marauders. The Italian colonialism in Africa, 1870-1943" (Kaos Edizioni), and in 2009 published a reprint volume of the "dictatorship. The Hidden History" (Espavo). He also published "The troubled Travaglio. The strange case of an informant uninformed, "" Pirates & Mafia. The true story of organized crime "and" concealment Masonic (Espavo 2010).
several years is also involved in investigative journalism, with particular reference to human rights violations, and ensure publication of the magazine NEW ENERGY http:/ / antonellarandazzo.blogspot.com/2010/01/campagna-abbonamenti-2010.html.
HOW TO BUY THE BOOK: To order the book should write to the e-mail address or
nuovaenergia@rocketmail.com
:
giadamd@libero.it indicating name and address.
I pay cash on delivery € 19.80 + 6.50 for contribution packaging and postage.
If you buy more books in the same order paid once the postage.
for orders over € 100 expenses are free.
Personal data will be treated in compliance with law 196/2003 on privacy, and will be deleted after the shipment.
E 'can pay by Paypal.
