Antonella Randazzo
Many people, who explored the issues in an honest way relating to the attacks of 11 September and 7 July, understanding the true dynamics, have wondered why Bush and Blair governments wanted a terrorist attack on their own territory.
Many have highlighted the need to impose laws that restrict civil liberties, but this is not the only reason.
Western authorities need to point out an enemy, and try to demonstrate its existence organize terrorist attacks. Even in Iraq, many of the attacks in which our news media give us are actually organized by the same Anglo-American army.
The main purpose of terrorism is to bring out the thoughts of citizens the idea that there is a fierce enemy, evil, cruel, and for this reason, the "democratic" Western authorities should support a war that, as stated by themselves, could also take 100 ( percent) years. The enemy "terrorist" is described like a mad man who hates and destroys for no reason.
Another purpose of terrorism is to Western food fear. Fear is an emotion of impotence, so if we are afraid we do not fight for our rights, but we submit to those who profess to take "protect." In fact, those who promise "security" and protection belongs to the same gruppo che crea e alimenta la paura.
Il terrorismo è anche utilizzato per criminalizzare i dissidenti. Spesso chi denuncia i crimini e lotta contro il sistema viene etichettato come "terrorista" o "antiamericano", e accusato di perseguire una sorta di "teoria del complotto" contro il potere “libero e democratico” degli Usa. In questo modo si offuscano pericolosamente gli intenti di difesa dei diritti umani, e si cerca di criminalizzare chi denuncia il crimine e non chi lo fa.
Le autorità occidentali sperano in un mondo in cui i poveri accettino passivamente di farsi sfruttare, senza lottare e senza reagire. Sognano un mondo in cui le masse rimangono passive verso i crimini e le ingiustizie, sorrette dalla fede religiosa, che gives a transcendent hope, their only granted.
Terrorism is used to justify any and every war crime. As many know, the war in Iraq, by all the media, was closely linked to "fight terrorism", and was adopted by many Western newspapers "just war", "inevitable" "required" and "defensive."
The enemy today, "Islamic terrorist", is described by the U.S. with absolute disgust and contempt, he does not belong to the Christian religion, and so it is easy to identify with the "beast" fight without mercy against whom the Bible.
The image of the enemy is burdened with transcendental meaning and becomes the very image of evil or devil, hence the "crusade" is not to convert but to exterminate. The enemy takes all the evil upon himself by allowing the party to acquire the characteristics of pure goodness. " Contempt for the enemy is so total and no other way out than the struggle to destroy.
In the traditional State of the Union speech on January 29, 2002, Bush clearly expressed the "doctrine" of the "axis of evil" and the need to combat enemies of civilization:
"Our cause is just, and must be more ... Thousands of dangerous killers, trained to kill in various ways, often with the support of outlaw regimes, are now scattered around the world as bombs ad orologeria pronte ad esplodere senza preavviso... Questi nemici vedono il mondo intero come un campo di battaglia, e noi dobbiamo dar loro la caccia ovunque si trovino... L’Iran è alla ricerca frenetica di queste armi e esporta terrore, mentre una minoranza non eletta reprime le speranze di libertà del popolo iraniano… La nostra guerra contro il terrorismo è cominciata bene, ma è solo all’inizio... I costi di questa guerra sono alti. Abbiamo speso più di un miliardo di dollari al mese – oltre 30 milioni di dollari al giorno – e dobbiamo essere pronti ad affrontare gli impegni futuri… Decisi nel nostro obiettivo, ora andiamo avanti. Abbiamo imparato il prezzo della libertà e abbiamo mostrato la sua forza. And in this great conflict, my fellow citizens, we will see the triumph of freedom. "(1) lists the Bush
enemy countries without explaining why they are blacklisted, he simply said that" terrorists "or that" are the process of developing missiles and weapons of mass destruction. "Obviously, there is no sign to the economic and oil issues, and even the training of mujahideen by the CIA. It is certain that" the dangerous hit men ready to kill themselves have been trained by the U.S. Secret Service, British or Israeli.
The U.S. is trying to protect the figure of the inexplicably cruel enemy, to the point of opposing any attempt UN to better understand what it really is terrorism. For example, in December 1987, the U.S. (with Israel) against a UN resolution against terrorism. The resolution provides, in addition to measures for the prevention of international terrorism, a study table that made light on the political and economic causes of terrorism, and who defines what is meant by "terrorism", to be able to distinguish from the struggles of peoples for rights. It was that of addressing the problem rationally and effectively, without seeing it as an evil mysterious and obscure.
However, several Latin American countries by the time U.S. authorities accuse of terrorism, having supported diversi dittatori e addestrato numerosi torturatori e criminali.
Nel 1986 gli Usa furono condannati dalla Corte Internazionale di Giustizia per terrorismo o "uso illegale della forza" contro il Nicaragua. Essi dichiararono che non avrebbero riconosciuto la giurisdizione della Corte. Il Nicaragua si rivolse al Consiglio di Sicurezza dell'Onu per chiedere una risoluzione che costringesse tutti gli Stati a rispettare il diritto internazionale. Gli Usa si opposero, rifiutandosi di accettare la giurisdizione internazionale.
Nel film-documento “Terrorstorm” si riportano prove schiaccianti circa le responsabilità dei governi occidentali negli attentati terroristici avvenuti nel loro paese e in paesi esteri. Tale documentario, di Alex Jones, describes the so-called "false flag", or the terrorist attacks passed off as "Islamic terrorism" but in fact deliberate and organized by the same Western governments. Jones collects items on the attacks in Madrid and London and interview two former officers of MI6, and several other influential people, which reveal numerous tests against Western governments. The various terrorist attacks may be linked together or have similar characteristics, which date back to a single strategy.
Jones explains: "To understand the London bombings and those who committed them must necessarily look to 11 March 2004 Madrid bombings. One year after the attacks, the government admits the absence of links with Al-Qaeda. Each of the alleged bombers had close links with the English secret services, including the leader of the bombers. The leader of the bombers, who gave the dynamite to the terrorists, was connected to the Madrid bomb squad, and we see the same characteristics in the attacks in London. On the morning of July 7, 2005, three trains and a bus was torn apart by four military-grade explosives ... despite the fact that three cars were burning, full of dead and dying in London, Scotland Yard for an hour and a half said that all interruptions were due only to a black out ... Then, mysteriously, after the attacks, the London Police Department ordered the No. 30 bus to leave the ... its normal road and park at the corner of Woburn Square and Tavistock Place ... Among the hundreds of buses in service that morning, the bus number 30 is the only one that is changed and the path that is directed at Tavistock Place. Remember, while everything is happening on television and the police are saying that this is a black out. Meanwhile, eyewitnesses described the explosions ... ... After the Scotland Yard investigators had a chance to speak with eyewitnesses ... officially declared that they believed that the attackers did not know how to have explosives in their backpacks ... The edition of "Fox News" of July 29 shows that the so-called 'minds attacks, Haroon Rashid Aswat is a British service employee. The former prosecutor and expert on terrorism for the FBI, John Loftus, told Aswat MI6 was protected and was under their control ... after a few hours from July 7 bombings, the Israeli military radio reported that Benjamin Netanyahu, former prime minister of Israel, had been warned not to leave his hotel that morning to attend a meeting in less than 100 meters from a station that was attacked ... following the Minister Sharon has given instructions to the responsible Israeli does not give interviews to foreign journalists about the warning ... For the convenience of the authorities of the bus cameras malfunction ... was something useful lying to authorities on all four identity cards of the "bombers" have withstood the explosions. There's only one problem: in one case one of the ID of the bombers was found in two different places ... It '... crystal clear that criminal elements in the government staged the attack and then covered it all. "(2) According to Jones
the planning of terrorist operations is kept secret to those elements who think sincerely serve their country through membership of a military body. To do so would have used different techniques for creating confusion, such as tutorials or military simulations at the same time and same place (or near) one which will have an attack. The simulations will mirror real events, to the point that the confusion will prevent a proper inspection by those who are in the dark. This occurred during the Sept. 11, July 7 and in other cases of terrorist attacks. Just a simulation has prevented the staff of NORAD to send fighter jets, because the simulation confused with reality.
Some agents have left horrified by British when they discovered that the same government had planned terrorist attacks. Tell Annie Machon, former MI5 agent: "I decided to quit out and report, together with my partner, because we had seen too many horrible things ... and we believed that the British deserved greater protection ... the collapse of the towers (twin) seemed to be a controlled demolition, and even the collapse of building 7 WTC. (E 'strange) The fact that the air defenses remained on the ground that day ... a whole series of tests makes it very suspect what happened on 9 / 11 ... we have to expose government involvement in 9 / 11, because if we do not , they will continue to do so in the future. "
A former MI5, David Shayler said: "By July 7 there was a witness rejected interviewed by a local newspaper ... (man) says he was hit in one of the carriages and saw no man with a backpack ... what I saw was a metal pointing upward from beneath the carriage. This would indicate that the bomb was inside the cab, but it sticks out, above and below it ... ... no one is following this track ... I learned of operations in which the British secret service MI6 and the outside ... were funding terrorism in the territory enemy without government permission. "
agents who decide to go out and talk to the organization are harassed and sometimes imprisoned or exiled. People who are simply limited to noting the government's attempts to limit the freedoms of the citizens were included in the list of terrorists. In short, it is not prosecuted those who organize terrorist attacks, but those who denounce the perpetrators of these crimes.
There are other authoritative figures, such as the British parliamentary Michael Meacher, who denounce state terrorism and its aims. Meacher declares: "... The attacks of 7 / 7 (served to) ensure Fear (s) control." The film documents
Jones is important to understand the cruelty of the U.S. authorities against human beings. They justify any criminal action, calling "pressure" Torture and acting with no respect della libertà e della dignità umana. Com’è evidente, sono colpevoli di crimini contro l’umanità e dovrebbero essere processate per questo. Se non avviene è perché attualmente manipolano anche l’Onu e i Tribunali Internazionali, curandosi di renderli inoperativi o di disconoscerne l’autorità quando si tratta di porre sotto processo personaggi del proprio establishment.
Quando in Italia i media annunciano che potrebbe avvenire un attentato terroristico, in realtà ci stanno minacciando, e stanno cercando di accrescere in noi la paura, allo scopo di renderci impotenti e sottomessi. La buona notizia è che se lo fanno significa che temono il popolo, temono le nostre reazioni perché sanno that when the majority of Italians were no longer willing to be deceived and to submit, their power would collapse.
It 'obvious that if preparing attacks or threaten the people, it means that their enemy is not "terrorism" but the people themselves. In fact, people are able to destroy their power, if only to overcome fear and want.
Terrorism, then, is now the weapon of the group in power, who is desperate because it's a lot of things have gotten out of hand, the proof is that you're reading one of the many articles that exposes them, and that was unthinkable even read only a few decades ago. This means that the path of awareness is andando avanti, e dipende da ogni persona attuarlo e alimentarlo. La consapevolezza, automaticamente, rende inefficace la loro propaganda.
Il fulcro del terrorismo sarebbe a Washington e a Londra, appoggiato dai servizi segreti di moltissimi paesi (compreso il nostro). Dunque se questo gruppo di criminali decidesse di organizzare un attentato in Italia, piuttosto che in Francia o in Belgio, le autorità e i servizi segreti locali si attiveranno affinché questo possa avvenire, e dopo l’attentato faranno in modo che le verità ufficiali possano insabbiare ogni responsabilità dei veri organizzatori. Com’è noto, nel nostro paese abbiamo avuto attentati terroristici durante il periodo detto della “strategia della voltage, "in which the U.S. authorities wanted to suppress the impulse to withdrawal of Italian citizens to claim rights and freedoms. Today, most terrorist attacks do not happen because the authorities have now occupied our parliament and our media, installed only on certain items and providing power (political and media) of people like Berlusconi. In recent decades the majority of Italian citizens became "mesmerized" by the television, and does not read or read very little, no longer has a life creatively and culturally active and believed to be increasingly powerless against the present system. This is the outcome that our authority volevano ottenere, ed è per questo che non sono più avvenuti attentati terroristici, fatte salve le minacce che ci arrivano di tanto in tanto per mantenerci nella paura.
I media, “educando” alla passività, sottraggono a poco a poco ai cittadini il potere di chiedere spiegazioni ai governi circa fatti che proverebbero la loro natura criminale. Senza la capacità di chieder conto ai propri rappresentanti politici e senza la giusta informazione, una democrazia non può esistere.
Non bisogna per forza citare Orwell per capire che la realtà attuale è perlomeno ambigua, e che ogni persona dovrebbe attivarsi per capire, poiché siamo giunti alla fase in cui l’attuale gruppo dominante non si farà take action against anyone for the sake of preserving his power. Illusion that it is not so means the power to satisfy these criminals, while aware of the reality can mean change. In the document
Jones are interviewed several British citizens, who seem to be unaware of the level of control of their governments (there were only 4 million cameras in London but they do not realize it) and believe that to be "protected" You must accept a restriction on freedom. In other words, most people believe the propaganda of the authorities, so that they continue to have power and carry out crimes. For an English woman was asked if "he wanted to sacrifice freedom for security" and the answer was "yes, sacrifice liberty for freedom." The woman was not aware of the paradox, as being "drugged" by the media propaganda of the regime. Even U.S. citizens, for the most part, were of one mind, having acquired the necessary knowledge to realize that the media and their authorities are deceiving them.
Finally, the terrorist attacks find their reason for being in the availability of people to believe in the propaganda of the regime, and to create an "enemy" foreign, making them unable to see that i propri governi sono il vero nemico, e che se mancherà la consapevolezza essi faranno altre guerre e organizzeranno altri crimini. Il potere di queste persone si basa sulla manipolazione mentale, e anche gli atti terroristici fanno parte di questa manipolazione, agendo sulle emozioni e sulle convinzioni politiche o ideologiche.
Se la Storia fosse raccontata nel giusto modo si capirebbe che è sempre stata storia delle persone comuni che volevano liberarsi dal potere tirannico, e oggi non c’è alcuna diversità rispetto al passato.
Non c’è arma che possa costringere alla schiavitù un popolo libero, per questo le attuali autorità creano paura, nemici e sottomissione, attraverso i media e il terrorismo. Finché Most people will be inclined to believe nell'autorevolezza of their authority and not to understand their many deceptions, democracy will remain a chimera.
Jones explains: "90% of their plans is based on psychological factors ... In simple terms it is to induce people to love their slavery ... The elite are making war on the people ... We are cheated into believing that the establishment is the our protector and our master parasitic. The architects of the New World Order for the control freaks are crazy ... they have enslaved humanity and are desperate to keep control of the flock ... The elite is threatened da umani liberi e indipendenti che controllano il loro destino. Sono minacciati dalla loro intelligenza, bellezza, onore, famiglia. Cercano di controllare il destino dell’umanità in una direzione che assicura il loro monopolio di potere per sempre . Sono sadici, codardi, non hanno nessun senso umano… (vogliono) solo il controllo e il mantenimento di quel controllo. Il mondo intero sta per essere programmato per essere un pianeta prigione, una griglia di controllo sull’umanità libera, dove il dissenso non è tollerato. Quando realizzerai che il potere costituito ti sta deridendo comincerai a cercare la verità e a combattere. Quando capisci il loro piano, è molto facile sconfiggerlo. Conoscere chi è il tuo nemico ti porta half the battle, react is the other half. You just have to free your mind, and globalization will be easy to defeat. "(3)
article:
" Origin and meaning of the concept of terrorism "
http://www.disinformazione.it/significato_terrorismo.htm
Copyright © 2008 - all rights reserved.
All rights reserved. Any use in whole or part of this article without the prior written consent. To request a reproduction of Article send an e-mail giadamd@libero.it
NOTE 1) George Bush, State of the Union Address, January 29, 2002.
2) Terrorstorm, Alex Jones documentary film produced in 2006.
3) Terrorstorm, Alex Jones documentary film produced in 2006.
0 comments:
Post a Comment