Di Antonella Randazzo
In questo articolo non si vuole denigrare nessuno, e tanto meno creare un clima di antagonismo.
Tuttavia, in seguito ad alcune mail ricevute da un attento e preparato lettore, mi sento in dovere di informare i lettori del blog su ciò che il giornalista Marco Travaglio scrive in privato. Essendo Travaglio un personaggio pubblico, che gode della fiducia di molte persone, credo sia un dovere dare maggiori informazioni su questo personaggio. Ciò risulta importante perché egli sembra essere una sorta di Giano Bifronte, ovvero un personaggio profondamente ambiguo: tanto gentile e liberale in pubblico, quanto scortese e intollerante in privato, specie quando l’interlocutore gli fa notare le sue contraddizioni.
Per rispetto della privacy of the reader, I will call under the pseudonym "John Doe". Obviously, I am able to prove the existence of the original mail. All
there began last July when, following the publication of my article "nonsense social" (http://antonellarandazzo.blogspot.com/2008/07/castronerie-varie.html), Smith sent me an email in which wrote: Dear Mrs.
I appreciate and thank you for your article despite being a constant reader of Labor and sharer of many of his complaints of civil and political (...)
the pleasure of reading the submission, together with my estimate, the piu'cordiali greetings. Mario Bianchi
A few days later I received, by the same Bianchi, another email saying:
Madam,
I know that in subsequent correspondence with Labor about his writings, I came unexpectedly from the same Travaglio the following statement:
"those on the right are against Israel and the Palestinians."
A great culture in international affairs! The
piu'cordiali greetings. Mario Bianchi
To which I replied:
Dear Joe Smith,
thanks for the information.
Last year I happened to hear with my ears phrases spoken by Labor that really showed a lot of ignorance about the situation Palestine and the State of Israel.
On the other hand, he knows that he will not be required to address these issues, especially in a historically correct. Sincerely
Antonella Randazzo
Mario Bianchi said
Madam,
Thank you for the feedback, adding that the question came from a
my call for Labor to deepen the international politics require him to read your blog for example Recalling that the world is not only Berlusconi processes. He replied that he did not need such advice and that the question he thinks he thinks "diametrically opposed to Mrs. Randazzo." Sincerely
Mario Bianchi
At this point, given that Labor had made a clear reference to me, and trying to pass off my complaints of "opinions", this issue was quite unpleasant. So I said to the reader:
Dear Joe Smith.
if he had the opportunity to speak to him again, ask Labor to avoid telling the truth that if another person says it means to be "opposite" of that person or, rather, be willing to compromise to continue to work within a system criminal who demands that you do not tell the whole truth.
It 'just too convenient for such people to say "do not think so" when they know why they do not say certain things. It's called corruption also this. Sincerely
Antonella Randazzo
The answer was:
Madam,
we closed the epistolary relationship because I
defined right-wing extremist and he is offended. Sincerely
.
In a moment of anger, Joe Smith had given Labor the ignorant, and the latter had replied:
"ignorant to tell someone else. Israel is a democratic country, nor is any Arab country, and even the so-called Palestinian Authority, who rigged elections and then vote immediately flows into a civil war bands. I ask, given his arrogant tone, not to bother anymore on my mail private. is good. "
mt
In short, Labor believes that the Israeli authorities are superior to the Arabs, that the electoral tricks are the prerogative of the Arab countries (they would be absent in "democratic" countries), and that the "warmongering spirit" is characteristic of the Arabs. Apparently not even know the known frauds that have allowed the election of Bush Junior. Not to mention the possibility of proving the existence of many tricks and vote rigging in many countries controlled by stegocrati, and how these wars are experienced in organizing.
Bianchi pointed out that at least he was not prepared on the Middle East, to which Labor said
"Are knowledgeable about Israel and its surroundings, thanks, no doubt. only, I think the opposite of her. when the Palestinians and the Arab countries will reach the level of democracy in Israel, we resent, if we are still alive.
is good. "
mt
The point is, Labor poses as a sort of champion of information and justice, denouncing the rampant misinformation and corruption of politicians and entrepreneurs. But the truth is very different: he is especially attentive to its public image and career, and look for political support, being ready to compromise to reach its goals. This explains why he is kind and smiling with who makes the compliments or asked him to write the dedication in his book, but became arrogant and rude to those who ask on behalf of his "shortcomings" and contradictions.
Labor is ready to be called "review" the massacre of thousands of Palestinians, and to close all communication with those who rudely disagrees with him.
conclude with a brief open letter to Labor:
Dear Mark,
until pursue this skit? And do not say "none of my business", if you wanted that people do not care what you say and do not write to your "private mail" instead of a journalist you should have done the employee or the greengrocer. You'd certainly earned
what you earn today, but at least you would have saved face.
Thousands of innocent victims, women, old people and children, for you are a matter of "opinion". It 'just too convenient place or try to cover up the crimes of the dominant group and at the same time wanting to pass off as a champion of truth and justice. This is simply immoral. Do not forget that those who do not report crimes becomes an accomplice of criminals.
think you have to continue to take advantage of the fact that the TV (where you appear as a serious journalist, champion of truth) is followed by million, while the independent news websites (where you are exposed) are followed by only a few thousand people ?
E 'this the law of mass media: a few will be properly informed and many will be uninformed. Do you think that will last forever
a system based on crime and deception? And you think it might be plausible to career earnings and hiding the truth of the system? In your case, than journalists like Bruno Vespa regime, things are much more serious because you, as Grillo, trying to deceive those who truly understood what the current system. And it's not cry "conspiracy" or to have delusions of persecution. If you take the trouble to read some articles of great writers and independent journalists, such as John Pilger and William Blum, you'll understand that in this world there are not only crimes committed by Berlusconi & C. but there is much more. Not enough to say "I am not ignorant about the Middle East" must be proven. If I'm just worried you have reported the "disappearance of the facts." Also alludes to yourself?
Enquire before informing, otherwise your information will be seriously flawed. Sincerely
Antonella Randazzo
Copyright © 2008 - all rights reserved.
All rights reserved. To request a reproduction of Article send an e-mail giadamd@libero.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment