Karl Popper has repeatedly held that there can be information that does not reflect a trend, which is a pure exposition of facts, separate da opinioni, valutazioni e preferenze.
L' insegnamento del grande filosofo austriaco pare anche su questo punto condivisibile.
Ma gli intellettuali italiani sembrano scegliere addirittura una diversa prospettiva. Molti interventi, perfino di figure eminenti per autorevolezza, mostrano un desiderio di influenzare le vicende politiche così scoperto e diretto da far pensare ad una sottovalutazione dell' intelligenza dei lettori.
Rappresenta una chiara manifestazione di tale discutibile trend this editorial in Corriere della Sera of Professor Mario Monti, former European Commissioner and current Chairman of 'Bocconi University:
The theme is that of the Italian crisis, the title "Less illusions to give hope."
writes Professor Monti
"There are two magicians in Italy. They are due, it said without any irony, to the doctrine of Karl Marx and the personality of Silvio Berlusconi."
"If Marx has nurtured a dream about a future in which significant traces survive in Italy, Berlusconi has done more. He was able to contribute in many Italians, a dream about this, for which the verification of the reality should be easier. "
So the 'influence of Silvio Berlusconi would be at least as regards its perniciousness and strength, that of almost a century of Marxism-Leninism, widely diffused by the largest communist party and cunning of 'West?
A symmetrical analogy whose institution is consistently accompanied by the liquidation of the bipolar dry Italian:
"But in many other cases, just think of the liberal professions, the corporate power has prevented the reforms or even go into port were taken. And there is not tough bargaining flames out of time (but at least it would protect the weaker members of society), but rather full-bodied privileged interests that, in order not to let it touch their annuities, a pole maneuver against each other: real beneficiaries bipolarity of the Italian. "
also significant is the 'praise of the Minister' s statement of the Berlusconi government, Mariastella Gelmini:
" This archaic style of claims, which often ends up doing harm the interests protected, it is a large obstacle to reform. But it can be overcome. We have seen recently with two important reforms due to Mariastella Gelmini and Sergio Marchionne. Thanks to their determination, will be a bit 'reduced disability in Italy to train students in doing research in making cars. "
short, while the Chairman of the Board exercises its pernicious influence, his courageous minister Gelmini carries out a major reform.
Note that this contrast between the capacity and the work of individual ministers and their negative role of chairman of the board is in a contemporary article Republic:
While the competent and active Foreign Minister Frattini try to bring back to Italy Battisti Brazil, Silvio Berlusconi troublemaker.
We therefore think that Berlusconi is not fulfilling its duty to address coordination, nullifying the Constitution . It establishes the fact ' art. 95 that " The Prime Minister shall direct the general policy of the government and is responsible. It keeps the unity of political and administrative policies, promoting and coordinating the activities of Ministers .
Otherwise we believe that individual Ministers do not apply direct orders. A good end, s' means.
the prime minister who, according to the ' art. 92 of the Constitution, propose to the President of the Republic, ministers to be appointed, is credited with having shown capable people?
These are short tests that circulate in Italy. And every country has the intellectuals it deserves.
0 comments:
Post a Comment